Auckland District Health Board Home | Contact Us | Phone Directory | Search     
Auckland District Health Board  
part of menu  

Trauma Homepage
Up
Navigation Bar Image
external link iconMinistry of Health
external link iconhttp://newzealand.govt.nz/

    horizontal line
 ©Copyright
 Published: 28/11/2011

Gunshot Wounds
Marcelo Devaud


Slide1.PNG
Slide1.PNG
2.99 KB
Slide2.PNG
Slide2.PNG
4.62 KB
Slide3.PNG
Slide3.PNG
5.46 KB
Slide4.PNG
Slide4.PNG
243.84 KB
Slide5.PNG
Slide5.PNG
6.44 KB
Slide6.PNG
Slide6.PNG
5.88 KB
Slide7.PNG
Slide7.PNG
7.52 KB
Slide8.PNG
Slide8.PNG
128.96 KB
Slide9.PNG
Slide9.PNG
45.78 KB
Slide10.PNG
Slide10.PNG
7.36 KB
Slide11.PNG
Slide11.PNG
10.13 KB
Slide12.PNG
Slide12.PNG
10.96 KB
Slide13.PNG
Slide13.PNG
9.42 KB
Slide14.PNG
Slide14.PNG
7.46 KB
Slide15.PNG
Slide15.PNG
6.64 KB
Slide16.PNG
Slide16.PNG
105.71 KB
Slide17.PNG
Slide17.PNG
6.43 KB
Slide18.PNG
Slide18.PNG
8.87 KB
Slide19.PNG
Slide19.PNG
8.40 KB
Slide20.PNG
Slide20.PNG
8.49 KB
Slide21.PNG
Slide21.PNG
3.23 KB
Slide22.PNG
Slide22.PNG
6.29 KB
Slide23.PNG
Slide23.PNG
8.66 KB
Slide24.PNG
Slide24.PNG
8.98 KB
Slide25.PNG
Slide25.PNG
6.26 KB
Slide26.PNG
Slide26.PNG
125.07 KB
Slide27.PNG
Slide27.PNG
7.08 KB
Slide28.PNG
Slide28.PNG
69.57 KB
Slide29.PNG
Slide29.PNG
69.28 KB
Slide30.PNG
Slide30.PNG
6.04 KB
Slide31.PNG
Slide31.PNG
6.06 KB
Slide32.PNG
Slide32.PNG
7.30 KB

Outline

Gunshot Wounds
Marcelo Devaud
Trauma Service
Auckland City Hospital

Introduction
• Understand the mechanisms: nature of firearms / projectiles
• Ballistics : scientific study of projectile motion
– internal
– external
– terminal à Wound ballistics: physician to understand

Civilian injuries
• Types of Firearms : handguns, rifles, airguns, and shotguns
• Wounding potential : KE = 1/2 mv2 ( joules )
• Type of projectile
• Type of tissue injured à energy dissipation
• Distance (range)

Handguns and rifles
• bullet strikes tissue à ceases spinning
• looses directional stability à “tumble”
• 180° tumble: mass concentrated at base
– permanent cavity elliptical-shaped tunnel
– temporary cavity shockwave compresses adjacent tissue.

Bullets
• Caliber : diameter (decimals of inch, millimeters)
• Construction
– low-velocity : entirely of lead
– medium- / high-velocity : metal jacket ( copper )
• full metal jacket
• semi-jacketed : deform on impact + fragmentation
hollow-point bullets -> mushroom shape
• Deformation:
– deliver more energy -> ↑ tissue damage

Bullet injuries
• Friable solid organs
– most severe : temp cavitation remote from bullet track
• Dense and loose tissues
– more resistant
– Alter course, slow down,↑ deformity and fragmentation
• straight trajectory à deflected (tissue density ) à straight trajectory

Airguns
• pellets
• air pressure from pumps, springs, or gas canisters
• low muzzle velocity à low wounding potential
• longer barreled à more kinetic energy
• close-range injuries can be fatal
• path of least resistance : fail to penetrate the fascia

Shotguns
• shotgun shells :
– Cartridge size : gauge (↑ gauge à↓ diameter)
– plastic : brass cap at base ( primer )
– wadding ( paper or plastic ): separates charge from pellets
• pellets : ( wounding potential )
– do not spin
– separate after leaving barrel
– velocity rapidly ↓
– many sizes : buckshot, birdshot

Injuries
• Close range ( <15 ft ): greater energy available
– massive destruction: combined mass of multiple pellets over small area
• Intermediate range :
– less predictable: severity function of anatomic location and pellet density
• long range : wider spread / lower velocity
– multiple, widely separated, superficial injuries
– painful but rarely life threatening

Pellet injuries
• Clinical practice : most involve birdshot
• Vascular injuries à embolization more likely
• shotgun pellets : lead / steel
• Steel pellets : move if exposed to magnetic field
– MRI : additional damage (contraindicated)
– Xray : can usually distinguish one from another
• Lead pellets : deformed and fragmented
• Steel pellets : remain round.

Gunshot Injury Assessment
• Prompt and accurate assessment
• entrance - exit wound : unreliable
à Surface wounds : characterize appearance – location
• Xray :
– surgical approach + additional imaging
– paths of the projectiles
– Metallic markers beside each surface wound
– Two projections of injured area
– additional radiographs : If projectile not found - no exit wound

Gunshot Injury Assessment
• Hemodynamically unstable
– Time only for Xray :
• Organs at risk à formulate action plan
• bullet quality, fragmentation, pathway, or other unsuspected foreign bodies
• “lead snowstorm”
– fragments deposited in soft tissues
– conical distribution : apex pointing toward entry site
Hemodynamic instability from presumed hemorrhagic shock precludes detailed imaging

Gunshot Injury Assessment
• Hemodynamically stable :
– CT scan :
• more accurate road map of injury
• better surgical approach: fragment crossed body cavities
– Xray + CT : direction of projectile travel and tissues injured
– CT - Angio :
• bullet or pellets close to major vessels
• significant injuries even when peripheral pulses are normal
– MRI :
• may not be safe : nature of bullet construction unknown

Gunshot Injury Assessment
• bullets not causing mechanical problems can be left in the tissues
• synovial joints : should always be removed
– slow leeching of lead by the synovial fluid
– chronic ↑ serum levels: lead arthropathy - poisoning

Pellet Emboli
• Arterio-arterial and veno-venous
• Prerequisites:
– very little kinetic energy
– diameter of vessel greater than projectile
• arterial circulation à embolize to the upper or lower extremities, intracranial circulation
• Management : dictated by whether symptomatic or asymptomatic

Shotgun wounds
Management
• Symptomatic embolus à peripheral ischemia
– remove as soon as possible ( tissue or neurologic function loss )
• Asymptomatic: may be left alone
– removal is technically difficult
– risk of further embolization or migration
– thrombosis, potential delayed arterial insufficiency
– pseudoaneurysm

Intracranial circulation emboli
• 50% from wounds to the neck and 50% to chest
• Entrance site : carotid - cardiac - pulmonary vein and vertebral artery
• Survivors : neurologic impairment
• Treatment :
– arteriotomy with removal of missile
– repositioning of pellet with clip to prevent migration
– supportive measures
• change in the neurologic examination : suspicion for delayed arterial migration

Extrathoracic veno-venous pellet emboli
• lodged in the right ventricle and in the pulmonary artery
• can be left in situ without risk of complications
• can be retrieved via percutaneous techniques with fluoroscopic guidance
• Acute setting: presence suggests major venous injury at entrance site that needs immediate exploration to prevent further embolization

Extremity arterio-arterial pellet emboli
• If no compromise to distal circulation à left without risk.
– ↓ patient morbidity without risk of late complications
• Exploration :
– Embolectomy catheters or direct arteriotomy (milking)
– Proximal and distal arterial control
– Numerous pellets and wadding usually found
– soft tissue defect : ( type III )
aggressive debridement - local flap coverage of vital structures - delayed closure of defect

Nonoperative Management of Abdominal
Gunshot Wounds
• Mandatory surgical exploration for GSW to abdomen has been a surgical dictum (WWII)
– hemodynamic instability
– Peritonitis
• Selective nonoperative treatment is gaining acceptance: HD stable patients without peritonitis
– Physical examination
– CT, DPL, Laparoscopy

Nonoperative treatment GSW
• avoids complications of unnecessary laparotomy
– 41.3% : atelectasis, prolonged ileus and UTI
– 2.5% : small bowel obstruction
– increases hospital length of stay and cost of care
• no significant increase in complications from delayed operative procedure in patients initially lacking positive clinical signs (<24 hours).
Clinical examination
• reliable and sensitive in dg intra-abdominal injury
• 1° Survey (ABC)
– HD unstable à OT
• 2° Survey : (HD stable)
– Peritoneal irritation à OT
– Retroperitoneum: ? Signs
– Distracting injuries: head trauma / intoxication
– hidden wounds :axilla, groin, perineum, gluteal folds

Determination of Trajectory
• determine whether bullet has entered peritoneal cavity
• Diagnostic Peritoneal Lavage :
– blood in the peritoneum : 10,000 RBCs/mm3
– bedside procedure, quick and accurate
– no information on specific injuries
– PPV: 96.7% , Sens: 87.5%

Determination of Trajectory
• Abdominal CT :
– valuable information in HD stable patients
– 3-D determination of missile trajectory
– defines injuries that may not need laparotomy
– missed injury : diaphragm

Determination of Trajectory
• Laparoscopy :
– limiting the need for full laparotomy
– Examination of anterior intra-abdominal structures
– Advantage over laparotomy :
• incision size , recovery time, pain, and shorter LOS
– Limitations : retroperitoneum - posterior diaphragm
aspects of small and large bowel
– indication : determining peritoneal penetration

Thoracoabdominal Wounds
• thoracic and abdominal contents
• motion of the diaphragm
• injuries treated differently, depending on side :
– Right : (7%) nonoperative
– Left: diaphragm and hollow visceral injury
• 31% : no signs of peritonitis
• 40% : normal chest radiograph
à Diagnostic laparoscopy

The Back and Flank
• paucity of literature : small numbers of patients
• Evaluating patients is especially difficult :
– Retroperitoneum : peritoneal irritation delayed or missing
– laparoscopy and DPL have limited value
• CT : test of choice à “triple contrast”
• selective nonoperative management appropriate and safe

The Pelvis
• restricted space with densely crowded internal structures
• transpelvic injuries : 85% organ injury
• selective nonoperative approach :
– adjuncts : urinalysis + rigid proctoscopy
• clinical examination :100% sensitive and 95.3% specific

Patient Selection
• ED physician : active role in initial resuscitation
• surgeon must always be involved with decision
• factors to be considered :
– clinical examination + determination of trajectory
– repeated reliable examinations
– Type of Weapon : tissue destruction

Conclusions
• studies are small and have wide confidence intervals
• larger studies : few groups of Level I trauma centers
• Small census of GSW may not allow practitioners to develop the mature judgment
• Level II and III trauma centers need to determine universality of this type of management


Created by IrfanView