Auckland District Health Board Home | Contact Us | Phone Directory | Search     
Auckland District Health Board  
part of menu  

Trauma Homepage
Up
Navigation Bar Image
external link iconMinistry of Health
external link iconhttp://newzealand.govt.nz/

    horizontal line
 ©Copyright
 Published: 28/11/2011

Blunt Carotid Trauma
Dr Jessica Savage
Dr Ben McGuiness


Slide1.JPG
Slide1.JPG
39.25 KB
Slide2.JPG
Slide2.JPG
85.88 KB
Slide3.JPG
Slide3.JPG
68.20 KB
Slide4.JPG
Slide4.JPG
44.74 KB
Slide5.JPG
Slide5.JPG
57.66 KB
Slide6.JPG
Slide6.JPG
53.81 KB
Slide7.JPG
Slide7.JPG
85.72 KB
Slide8.JPG
Slide8.JPG
69.55 KB
Slide9.JPG
Slide9.JPG
50.00 KB
Slide10.JPG
Slide10.JPG
88.29 KB
Slide11.JPG
Slide11.JPG
52.29 KB
Slide12.JPG
Slide12.JPG
68.52 KB
Slide13.JPG
Slide13.JPG
31.43 KB
Slide14.JPG
Slide14.JPG
85.17 KB
Slide15.JPG
Slide15.JPG
84.23 KB
Slide16.JPG
Slide16.JPG
72.45 KB
Slide17.JPG
Slide17.JPG
71.93 KB
Slide18.JPG
Slide18.JPG
40.07 KB
Slide19.JPG
Slide19.JPG
79.36 KB
Slide20.JPG
Slide20.JPG
107.38 KB
Slide21.JPG
Slide21.JPG
32.91 KB
Slide22.JPG
Slide22.JPG
79.61 KB
Slide23.JPG
Slide23.JPG
39.98 KB
Slide24.JPG
Slide24.JPG
57.08 KB
Slide25.JPG
Slide25.JPG
86.34 KB
Slide26.JPG
Slide26.JPG
19.77 KB
Slide27.JPG
Slide27.JPG
42.36 KB
Slide28.JPG
Slide28.JPG
70.64 KB
Slide29.JPG
Slide29.JPG
71.91 KB
Slide30.JPG
Slide30.JPG
72.42 KB
Slide31.JPG
Slide31.JPG
85.80 KB
Slide32.JPG
Slide32.JPG
48.59 KB

Outline

“In the neck” :
Blunt Carotid trauma
Dr Jessica Savage, Surg Reg
Dr Ben McGuiness, Radiologist
ADHB Trauma Forum April 2011

Introduction
 Blunt carotid trauma accounts for <1% of all blunt traumas
 Currently many debates exist:
– Who to suspect BCI in (Screening)
– How to diagnose (Imaging)
– How/ when to intervene (Treatment options)
– Longer term follow up
 Two cases from Auckland

The spectrum of BCI
 A broad diagnosis encompassing carotid intimal disruption, dissection and thrombosis.
 The Denver “Grading scale”

Blunt carotid injury is
 Rare
– Incidence <1% (up to 2% with screening)
 Often missed
– 50% of patients asymptomatic at arrival
 Potentially lethal
– Mortality rates 20-60%
– Neurological morbidity rates up to 80%

Treatment options for BCI

Case Study 1
Case Study 1
Mechanism:
 40yr old motorcyclist, full protective gear and helmet collides at low speed with slow moving car
On Arrival:
 Haemodynamically stable and GCS 15/15
 Complains of right sided neck pain.
On Examination:
 Clinical nasal fracture, Phalynx fracture and right neck bruise.
Initial Investigaton:
 CT head and C-spine performed.
– Fractures of C5/6 spinous processes, CT head -NAD
Then…
 Whilst in ED developed focal Left Hemiparesis

CTA: Right internal carotid artery occlusion from 3cm above it’s origin, probably due to dissection

MRI 3 hours later (Day 0) : Extensive restricted diffusion within right anterior and middle cerebral artery territories.

Case Study 1
 CTA neck: right internal carotid artery occlusion/ dissection from 3cm above origin to cavernous sinus, early ischemic changes noted
 MRI head 3hrs later: ischemic changes over the right hemisphere
 Admitted to HDU
 Lengthy discussions held overnight between Neurology, Neurosurgery, ITU and radiology.
 Decision made NOT to proceed with anticoagulation or surgical intervention

CT Head Day 1: Extensive right hemispheric infarct, with midline shift, secondary to right internal carotid occlusion

 On day 2 Pt dropped GCS to 12/15
 Decompressive craniotomy performed
 Extubated on day 3. Responded normally for a brief period then vomited. Dropped GCS to 8 (E1V1M6)
 Developed LRTI
 Day 5 – Pt Extubated following family discussion
 Day 7- Patient died

Discussion:

High index of suspicion
 Often BCI patients have a symptom-free period of hours to days after presentation
 Early diagnosis may improve survival
(Berne et al time to diagnosis: 12.5 hrs in survivors,19.5 hours in fatalities)
 Mechanism
 C-spine hyperextension & rotation, hyperflexion or direct blow
 Examination

Screening for BCI?
 Screening assymptomatic patients is controversial and many people have suggested screening criteria

Could we have detected this earlier?
Recommendations for symptomatic patients:
 Patients presenting with any neurologic abnormality that is
unexplained by a diagnosed injury should be evaluated for BCI.
 Blunt trauma patients presenting with arterial epistaxis following trauma should be evaluated for BCVI.
The Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma

What Imaging to use?
 CTA – fast, convenient, and with new detector scanners reliable. Most of the negative literature is on old technology.
 MRA – can see the wall, probably not better for lumen, not good for acute/unstable patient
 DSA – gold standard for lumen calibre, dynamic (for collateral flow), takes time, risk is minimal

Managing BCI

Grade IV lesions:

Managing this case
 Large vessel arterial occlusion has very low rate of recanalisation (<10%) spontaneously or with IV tPA
 Large MCA ischemia (clinically or on imaging (DWI/PWI) has dismal outcome
 Therefore if acute (say <8hrs) hemispheric neurological signs with a blocked or severely stenosed artery… “nothing to lose, plenty to gain” situation
 Emergent stent insertion for acute traumatic and nontraumatic carotid dissection shows favourable results in recent small series
Jeon P et al. AJNR 2010; 31: 1529-31
 Major problem with stenting is need for dual antiplatelet agents in the setting trauma and likely bleeding risk.
 Time is crucial and therefore rapid MDT weighing of risk is needed

Case Study 2
 Fully restrained racing car driver, high speed roll-over, Car bursts into flames, Pt self extricates and extinguishes fire!
 Brought by Ambulance to ED. Main complaints right neck pain, transient left arm numbness, swallowing difficulty.
 Haemodynamically stable. GCS 14/15 (E4,V4, M6)
 CT Head and neck.
– Retropharyngeal haematoma noted, Right, C2 level

CT Head and neck 01.21

CTA: Right ICA pseudo-aneurysm at the level of C2.

Case study 2
 Anticoagulated with heparin
 No surgical/ endovascular intervention due to the difficulty accessing this lesion
 Follow up MRA 24Hrs later, showed no dissection in the vessel wall and a stable pseudoaneurysm.
 Remained asymptomatic.
 Repeat CT Angiogram a week later prior to discharge showed the lesion unchanged
 Discharged with Warfarin. Follow up planned.

Case Discussion
Managing this case

Anticoagulation
 Level 3 evidence for antithrombitic therapy
 Either heparin or antiplatelet therapy can be used
– Many authors recommend heparin if there is no active bleeding
 If heparin is selected for treatment, the infusion should be started without a bolus and titrated to an aPTT of 50-60 sec.
 Heparin is then converted to Warfarin, titrating to a PT INR of 2-3, for 3-6 months is recommended

Grade III lesions:
Endovascular Treatment
 Indication is if persistent emboli on medical treatment or persistent enlargement of aneurysm
 Best done delayed
– can load with antiplatelets
– bleeding risk is minimized
 Jail microcatheter in aneurysm, deploy stent to hold coils and then coil aneurysm.

Conclusions
 ‘Best treatment’ is currently unknown
 Most authors seem to agree that:
– Anticoagulation decreases mortality and stroke risk
– Antiplatelet therapy seems as effective at preventing strokes, with a lower haemorrhage risk than anticoagulants.
– Patients with a fixed, dense neurological deficit should be conservatively managed
 Multicenter, systematic trials are needed to compare anticoagulation vs invasive intervention, and to recommend antithrombotic regimens

Take home message:
 BCI is rare, easily missed and kills
 Be suspicious and act early…. Get a CTA and discuss with MDT
 Consider Antithrombotic therapy, even in trauma.

Created by IrfanView