Auckland District Health Board Home | Contact Us | Phone Directory | Search     
Auckland District Health Board  
part of menu  

Trauma Homepage
Up
Navigation Bar Image
external link iconMinistry of Health
external link iconhttp://newzealand.govt.nz/

    horizontal line
 ©Copyright
 Published: 28/11/2011

Improving the diagnosis and management of paediatric TBI
Bridget Kool


Slide01.jpg
Slide01.jpg
125.39 KB
Slide02.jpg
Slide02.jpg
86.88 KB
Slide03.jpg
Slide03.jpg
127.71 KB
Slide04.jpg
Slide04.jpg
93.96 KB
Slide05.jpg
Slide05.jpg
95.46 KB
Slide06.jpg
Slide06.jpg
80.41 KB
Slide07.jpg
Slide07.jpg
76.64 KB
Slide08.jpg
Slide08.jpg
76.83 KB
Slide09.jpg
Slide09.jpg
77.89 KB
Slide10.jpg
Slide10.jpg
107.93 KB
Slide11.jpg
Slide11.jpg
105.66 KB
Slide12.jpg
Slide12.jpg
86.77 KB
Slide13.jpg
Slide13.jpg
70.32 KB
Slide14.jpg
Slide14.jpg
134.20 KB
Slide15.jpg
Slide15.jpg
100.10 KB
Slide16.jpg
Slide16.jpg
88.48 KB
Slide17.jpg
Slide17.jpg
134.81 KB

Outline Improving the diagnosis and management of mild TBI among children presenting to the emergency department
Bridget Kool, Sarah Sharpe, Michael Shepherd,
Stuart Dalziel, Shanthi Ameratunga

INJURY 2010 Conference

MTBI background
* "Silent Epidemic"
* 90% of all TBI among children = "mild"
* 1:5 children experience 1 MTBI < 16 years
* 3 to 5 times as many seen in 10 care
* Significance:
- Complications e.g. somatic symptoms, cognitive deficits, behavioural problems
- Large burden on individuals, families, and the healthcare system

Recent research
Aim: To determine if children with head injuries, who are discharged home from ED, are managed according to best practice standards

Objectives:
- Collection of data for determining the diagnosis of TBI
- Application of criteria for safe discharge
- Provision of information and advice about TBI
- Description of follow-up practices

Methods
* Clinical audit of ED records
* Children aged 0-14 years discharged in 2007 from Starship Hospital ED following a head injury
* Stratified purposeful sampling strategy: 60 patients, 15 from four ethnic groups
* Processes of care relating to the objectives were compared with best practice standards derived from guidelines

Key findings

* Data elements were documented to a high standard
* Diagnosis of MTBI:
- Not evident that data elements were applied systematically to diagnose MTBI or estimate the probability of MTBI
- 30 of 60 cases filled criteria for definite or possible TBI
- Discharge codes used interchangeably

Documentation of data elements: 0-4 years (n=20)

Additional findings relating to documentation
* Criteria for safe discharge
- 80% did not specifically document the adequacy of support structures

* Information and advice
- 88% had documentation that information was given
- 1 record - consideration of language needs
- 4 records - consideration of prevention issues

* Follow-up
- Discharge summary letter to GP
- 14 children referred to GP
- 20 patients with definite/possible brain injury had no specific follow-up plans

Discussion points
* Possible contributors to variability in documentation
- Main aim of ED management of TBI is detection of clinically significant acute complications
- Recognition and identification of MTBI is a challenge

* Actions to improve quality of care
- Improve recognition and appropriate follow-up of MTBI
- Develop integrated services
- Prevention advice
- Cultural support

* Further research
- An improved evidence base about MTBI among children is required

Translational Research Project
Aim
To develop and implement a computerised decision support system (CDSS) tool to improve the diagnosis, management, and follow-up of acute MTBI among children in the ED setting

Objectives
* To explore the management of children with MTBI in other settings

* To identify barriers to current best practice

* To develop a CDSS for the diagnosis, management, and follow-up of children with MTBI

* To follow-up children with MTBI assessed using the CDSS tool
Computerised (clinical) Decision Support System(CDSS)
"Clinical Decision Support systems link health observations with health knowledge to influence health choices by clinicians for improved health care". R. Hayward, Centre for Health Evidence

Methods
Phase One: Identifying barriers to best practice
* Retrospective audit of 60 children presenting with MTBI to a Whitecross A & M clinic and Kidz First ED
* Interviews with Clinicians to identify barriers to care

Phase Two: Translation of knowledge into best practice
* Development of the evidence-based CDSS tool. Focus on "when to CT/refer" and identifying and managing MTBI.

Methods continue
Phase Three: Evaluation
* Follow-up study of 40 children who have been assessed by the CDSS
* Detailed interviews with 20 clinicians who have piloted and used the CDSS
* Retrospective audit of 60 cases to establish if CDSS resulted in best-practice care

Phase Four: Cohort Study Foundation
* The CDSS will allow development of a detailed long-term cohort of children who have suffered MTBI

Investigators & Study Advisory Group
* Principal Investigators: Dr Bridget Kool & Dr Stu Dalziel
* Co investigators: Dr Mike Shepherd, Dr Hine Elder, Prof. Shanthi Ameratunga, Dr Sue Wells, Prof. Jim Warren

Study Advisory Group
White Cross Accident and Medical, Brain Injury New Zealand; Kaiatawhai, Starship; Dr Jocelyn Neutze (Paediatric emergency care specialist) Dr Kathryn Edward and EeWei Lim (paediatric rehab specialists), Pip Bishop (paediatric OT); paediatric neuropsychologist (TBC); Dr Matire Harwood, (Clinical Director for T?maki Healthcare); ACC
Acknowledgements
Starship Children's Emergency Department
White Cross Accident and Medical
Kidz First


Created by IrfanView